A Czech website benchmarked R5 3500X from same batch, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus and other content creators put the R5 3500X to the test against all other modern CPUs including R5 3600 and i5-9400F so you can check them out if you want games-wide performance numbers. The difference is that it lacks hyper-threading which is a downside in some productivity apps while games are usually not affected by it. Also AMD Ryzen performance is best with high frequency RAM where as Intel is less reliant on this and may perform well with cheaper memory kit.ģ500X is very similar to popular R5 3600. Reason why i9-9900K is still top performer in some games is due to that lower latency. Intel will have lower inter core latency where as AMD will have IPC, memory frequency and bandwidth advantage and those differences may play some role in specific workloads. AMD product can reach 4100MHz on all cores but it frequency can also vary based on thermal headroom.īoth are six core and six thread and should perform quite similarly. 9400F has lower base clock but can boost to same 4100MHz in single threaded loads. Made between 8-14 July 2019, silicon wafer from Saratoga, ATMP in Suzhou, ChinaĬPUs are quite similar to each other. More commonly available R5 3600 will likely be bit more expensive than 9400F (discounts may vary this). I got one and used in this benchmark to have two factory 6C/6T CPUs from both companies. The price may be higher with shipping and other costs of ordering from China depending on your location. A tray version from Aliexpress can cost around 110 EUR - if you find any available as AMD isn't keen on having sales of this model outside intended markets. The R5 3500X is a Ryzen CPU available on the Asian markets and usually not available in other regions - where R5 3600 reigns supreme. Intel i5-9400F is a well known CPU priced in Europe at around 155 EUR. For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Gears of War 5, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Resident Evil 4, Far Cry 6 at 60 fps to 61 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 61 fps.įor 2160p 4K, we were able to play Overwatch 2, Valorant at 70 fps to 148 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 109 fps.AMD or Intel?, many or just few cores? What is better for World of Warcraft? To answer that question I decided to benchmark Ryzen R5 3500X and Intel i5-9400F in a set of WoW scenarios.
#3500x benchmark 1080p
Compared to its AMD 's closest rival, RX 5700, the RTX 2060 was -4.3 % slower.įor 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart, Elden Ring, Marvel's Avengers, Dying Light 2, Total War: Warhammer III at 61 fps to 65 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 63 fps. The RTX 2060 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 1060 6GB and it really justifies an upgrade. In our synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 2060 blows past the GTX 1060 6GB and, amazingly, even the GTX 1070 as well.įortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. Spec for spec, this RTX 2060 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 1060 6GB, by boasting 60.9 % more fps. Meanwhile, the AMD closest equivalent card is the RX 5700 which costs $ 349. Compare this to the GTX 1060 6GB, which came originally at a price of $ 254. The RTX 2060 is much more expensive than the GTX 1060 6GB as it costs a whopping $ 350. After taking the time to fully test the Turing graphics card inside the RTX 2060, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s x圆0 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. The good news is, with the release of the RTX 2060 SUPER, the RTX 2060 's price is getting more discount. On the other hand, the RTX 2060 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 350.
#3500x benchmark Pc
The RTX 2070 might be the mid-range flagship of the latest Turing set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most entry-level PC gamers. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
0 kommentar(er)
